[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ga] Final draft of proposed mailing list rules



You didn't answer the question in respect of ICANN's and the DOC's
liability in all this DNSO junk.  It's a tender question - but still worth
the answer.

Regards
Joe

On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, James Touton wrote:

> Joe and all DNSO'ers,
> 
>   Yes.  But the truth will still be known.  As to whether anyone wishes
> to hear or read it is a question that shall be of an individual nature, as
> always.
> 
> !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, William X. Walsh wrote:
> >
> > > What you miss, is that under this plan, this would never happen.  The
> > > disruption would occur only for those silly enough to subscribe to the
> > > unfiltered list.  The official discussion would of been untouched, or only
> > > lightly touched for a short time, by such silliness.
> >
> > William - Stalin would be proud of your statements.  Basically - the
> > official discussion list will be a record of what is officially
> > approved.  Like washing underwear - nes pas.
> >
> > Regards
> > Joe
> 
> James Touton
> Legal and Policy Advisory Council,
> INEGRoup (Stakeholder)
> 
> __________________________________________
> NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
> Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at
> http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
>