[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ga] Final draft of proposed mailing list rules
On Wed, Jan 19, 2000 at 02:58:42PM +0100, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> You wrote:
> >The GA has nothing whatsoever to do with the voting pool for at-large
> >Board members.
> True, but don't you think that it is very likely that most of the people
> who are now participating in the GA will be eligible for ICANN
Also true, but I don't think very relevant. Current plans call for
there being 5000 members, a figure that can only be reached by some
totally different process. The entire current ga would be 5% of the total
membership. The active members on the list would be like 2%.
> I would go even further, and say that this debate (mailing list, rules,
> membership, ...) will be looked at with interest by ICANN before
> defining the criteria and rules for ICANN membership (the voting pool
> for at-large Board members).
Some interest, perhaps. But that at-large membership is not going to
be just a 5000 member mailing list -- the situation in the GA doesn't
Kent Crispin "Do good, and you'll be
firstname.lastname@example.org lonesome." -- Mark Twain