Re: [ga] PAB Rules v. RROR

["William X. Walsh" <william@dso.net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 11-Jan-2000 Mark C. Langston wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 11:22:39PM -0800, William X. Walsh wrote:
>> 
>> Mark,
>> 
>> I have to take exception to something you are using to bolster your argument
>> here.
>> 
>> On 11-Jan-2000 Mark C. Langston wrote:
>> > And as *I* pointed out earlier, much of the rules I proposed have been
>> > implemented independently in WG-C out of necessity.
>> 
>> This implies that WG-C is operating under a set of rules that are
>> substantially
>> representative of your proposal.  Being a member of that workgroup, I
>> question
>> this.  I see no evidence of this being true.
>> 
> 
> 
> You forget, I'm also a member.
> 
> Two post limit is a form of debate limit.
> Position papers are equivalent to limiting debate.  Read the definition if
> you don't believe me.
> The vote just taken is a roll-call vote, plain and simple.  The only thing
> that was missing was the chair calling the names.
> The vote for chair was too, in essence, though sloppy.
> The motions for extending deadlines were just that.
> Need I go on?
> 

Mark,

Those are VERY common rules, and only resemble your proposal in the most
broad and general way.  I would not consider your characterization of these
rules to yours as an accurate one.

- --
William X. Walsh <william@dso.net>
DSo Networks  http://dso.net/
Fax: 877-860-5412 or +1-559-851-9192
GPG/PGP Key at http://dso.net/wwalsh.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: DSo Networks

iD8DBQE4e24K8zLmV94Pz+IRAkO0AJ9SsS+1Z8BI5M8PZcBHHjszE9gSHQCg1p+2
e5HBFNemgY5p0z9iWKCaVZg=
=JGA2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----