Re: [ga] NC members, censorship and other absurd things

[Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>]

On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 02:34:58PM -0500, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Nov 1999, Kent Crispin wrote:
> 
> > > in this model outside the US.
> > 
> > Lost me there, counselor..."conceivably" is a very broad 
> > term...
> > 
> > 
> 
> I can imagine a rational legal system that would impose such liability.
> The US does not, and I don't happen to know of a non-US one that would,
> but I am not an expert in non-US law, so it might well exist for all I
> know.  In short, I can "conceive" of it, but I don't "know" of it.  

I'm sorry -- I should have asked a direct question to begin with. 
What is the "it" that you can conceive of, and what is its
hypothetical basis?  That is, what is this potential liability?

-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Do good, and you'll be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain