Re: [ga] nominations

["J. Baptista" <baptista@pccf.net>]

I don't know who Richard is - I only suspect.  As for Nii he's ok.  A
polite man - and the world need more polite people.  Not more sheep, just
more polite people - there a difference.

I was very satisfied with Nii's response to us, on our concern with
respect to the lawyers.

Regards
Jeff (just kidding - honest ;-)

On Sun, 19 Sep 1999, Peter Veeck wrote:

> Who is Richard?  Well--- aah---- I've heard of Harvey, he's a Puka, Is Richard a
> Puka too?
> Probably a fitting end to this thread.  After all Randy started us all off on
> these nominations with his nomination of Nii.  We've been following him and he
> sees Richard.
> 
> "J. Baptista" wrote:
> 
> > See what I said Frank.  They're all nuts.  Now you and I are Richard.
> > Randy, it's Joe Baptista.  I don't smell like Richard.  Do you need some
> > proof.  Do you know Richard?  If you know Richard I can prove I'm not him.
> >
> > Help us out here Randy, don't cause yourself further embarrassment.
> >
> > I don't know if you can appreciate my position, but your making PCCF the
> > most watched show in Town.  If it's not Shaw making a twit of himself and
> > bring attention to us (by default), it you a nice guy with a good
> > reputation who's playing our fool.  My sponsors, all 20 of them used to
> > all log into that virtual worlds place and play.  Now they log into PCCF
> > and read the lists.
> >
> > Fanego says it's better then a funny soap opera.
> >
> > I think it's important that the GA know were real.  By making these claims
> > Randy, your only enforcing Mr. Shaw's liability.  We are not spies.  In
> > fact I just found out today how to spell it.
> >
> > So what can I do for you.  What proof do you need from me to satisfy
> > yourself that I don't smell anything like Richard.
> >
> > On Sun, 19 Sep 1999, Randy Bush wrote:
> >
> > > > Something worse than a trial balance is getting raided by the Internal
> > > > Revenue Agency, but thats never going to happen if the people running the
> > > > show is the Dept of Commerce, so what else should we do string them up by
> > > > the thumbs?
> > >
> > > didn't know that was an objective, richard.
> > >
> > > randy
> > >
>