<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga-watchdog] endorsements
It's irrelevant now, as it is already too late, but I agree with my
colleagues.
RG
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Izumi Aizu [mailto:izumi@anr.org]
> Sent: Saturday, 05 January, 2002 09:30
> To: DNSO Secretariat
> Cc: ga-watchdog@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [ga-watchdog] endorsements
>
>
> I also agree with Dany and Kent that Secretariat should not play any
> active role for this matter.
>
> izumi
>
> At 5:29 PM +0100 02.1.4, Dany Vandromme wrote:
> >DNSO Secretariat wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear Watchdogs,
> >> At the present time, Eric Dierker has only one
> endorsement, so according to
> >> the rules he is not eligible as a candidate as the rules
> state that each
> >> candidate must have at least 2 endorsements. However the
> rules doallow for
> >> self endorsement.
> >> Should I point this out to him in a private mail, or just
> leave things as
> >> they are?
> >> Thank you for your advice and help
> >> Glen
> >>
> >> DNSO Secretariat
> >>
> >> --
> >> GA Watchdog Committee
> >-
> >I suggest to leave things as they are.
> >Dany
> >-
> >--
> >-------------------------------------------------------------------
> >Dany VANDROMME | Directeur du GIP RENATER
> >
> > Reseau National de Telecommunications
> > pour la Technologie, l'Enseignement et la Recherche
> >
> > | ENSAM
> >Tel : +33 (0)1 53 94 20 30 | 151 Boulevard de l'Hopital
> >Fax : +33 (0)1 53 94 20 31 | 75013 Paris
> >E-mail: Dany.Vandromme@renater.fr | FRANCE
> >--------------------------------------------------------------------
> >--
> >GA Watchdog Committee
>
> --
> GA Watchdog Committee
>
--
GA Watchdog Committee
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|