ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-watchdog]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ga-watchdog] endorsements


It's irrelevant now, as it is already too late, but I agree with my
colleagues.
RG

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Izumi Aizu [mailto:izumi@anr.org]
> Sent: Saturday, 05 January, 2002 09:30
> To: DNSO Secretariat
> Cc: ga-watchdog@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [ga-watchdog] endorsements
> 
> 
> I also agree with Dany and Kent that Secretariat should not play any
> active role for this matter.
> 
> izumi
> 
> At 5:29 PM +0100 02.1.4, Dany Vandromme wrote:
> >DNSO Secretariat wrote:
> >>
> >>  Dear Watchdogs,
> >>  At the present time, Eric Dierker has only one 
> endorsement, so according to
> >>  the rules he is not eligible as a candidate as the rules 
> state that each
> >>  candidate must have at least 2 endorsements.  However the 
> rules doallow for
> >>  self endorsement.
> >>  Should I point this out to him in a private mail, or just 
> leave things as
> >>  they are?
> >>  Thank you for your advice and help
> >>  Glen
> >>
> >>  DNSO Secretariat
> >>
> >>  --
> >>  GA Watchdog Committee
> >-
> >I suggest to leave things as they are.
> >Dany
> >-
> >--
> >-------------------------------------------------------------------
> >Dany VANDROMME                    |  Directeur du GIP RENATER
> >
> >                 Reseau National de Telecommunications
> >          pour la Technologie, l'Enseignement et la Recherche
> >
> >                                   | ENSAM
> >Tel   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 30     | 151 Boulevard de l'Hopital
> >Fax   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 31     | 75013 Paris
> >E-mail: Dany.Vandromme@renater.fr |  FRANCE
> >--------------------------------------------------------------------
> >--
> >GA Watchdog Committee
> 
> --
> GA Watchdog Committee
> 
--
GA Watchdog Committee



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>