[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ga-procedures] Re: [ga] Sims' legal advice to the NC/Process predetermination
- To: ga@dnso.org
- Subject: [ga-procedures] Re: [ga] Sims' legal advice to the NC/Process predetermination
- From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 16:32:21 -0800
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9911190813170.9525-100000@crom.tallship.net>; from idno@tallship.net on Fri, Nov 19, 1999 at 08:21:19AM -0800
- Mail-Followup-To: ga@dnso.org
- References: <199911191903.LAA17854@agamemnon.home.com> <Pine.LNX.4.04.9911190813170.9525-100000@crom.tallship.net>
- Sender: owner-ga-procedures@dnso.org
On Fri, Nov 19, 1999 at 08:21:19AM -0800, idno@tallship.net wrote:
> We could always send JW and Lord Baptista up as
> nominees. I'm not suggesting that, but something llike that could limit
> the pool and ineffect gives us the control we desire to choose from our
> one two or three favorite candidates.
Note that this is a very strong argument against any fixed number of
nominees being sent.
--
Kent Crispin "Do good, and you'll be
kent@songbird.com lonesome." -- Mark Twain