ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ga] A Farce in a Pretty Package


Thanks Bret.  Just one more point of clarification.  Is the sixth hurdle
independent in the sense of not being part of ICANN as the IRP was
originally intended?

BTW, I had reviewed Becky's recommendation and thought it was good.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bret Fausett [mailto:fausett@lextext.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 5:58 PM
> To: Gomes, Chuck; ga@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [ga] A Farce in a Pretty Package
> 
> 
> Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> > Where is the "independent review?"  How are the other five 
> review steps
> > independent?
> 
> Two uses of "independent." When I said there were six 
> "independent" checks,
> I meant "independent" as in "not dependent on or conditioned 
> by or relative
> to anything else." When I said that one of those checks was 
> "independent"
> review, I meant "independent" as in "free from external control and
> constraint."
> 
> I thought my intention was apparent from context, but just to 
> be clear:
> there are six "distinct" hurdles to cross before something 
> becomes a policy,
> and one of those is "independent review."
> 
> Becky Burr recently submitted a recommendation on how 
> independent review
> might work: 
> http://www.icann.org/committees/evol-reform/afap-report-23aug02.htm
> 
>       -- Bret
> 
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>