ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Violations of the Bylaws? - (The WLS Decision)


Danny and all assembly members,

  I think you mean Joe Sims and Louis Toutons bylaws, not "Ours"...

  In any event these are good questions to ask.  As you may also
recall or have researched, this (There recent WLS vote) is one of many
times  that the ICANN BOD has violated the ICANN/Joe Sims
and Louis Touton bylaws.

  Of course I am sure you Danny as myself and I am sure others
are awaiting the usual Vint non-answer spin as answers to these
good questions you pose...

DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:

> Dear Vint,
>
> Before I proceed to file a reconsideration request, I would appreciate an
> answer to the following questions:
>
> 1.  Our bylaws state:  "The Board shall post on the Web Site (i) periodically
> a calendar of scheduled meetings for the upcoming year, and (ii) in advance
> of each Board meeting, a notice of the fact and time that such meeting will
> be held and, to the extent known, an agenda for the meeting. If reasonably
> practicable, the Board shall post notices of special meetings of the Board at
> least fourteen (14) days prior to the meetings."  The notice of the special
> meeting of the Board was not posted 14 days in advance of such meeting -- Why?
>
> 2.  Our bylaws state:  "If the Board declines to accept any recommendation of
> a Supporting Organization, it shall return the recommendation to the
> Supporting Organization for further consideration, along with a statement of
> the reasons it declines to accept the recommendation.  If, after reasonable
> efforts, the Board does not receive a recommendation from the Supporting
> Organization that it finds meets the standards of Section 2(e) of this
> Article VI or, after attempting to mediate any disputes or disagreements
> between Supporting Organizations, receives conflicting recommendations from
> Supporting Organizations, and the Board finds there is a justification for
> prompt action, the Board may initiate, amend or modify and then approve a
> specific policy recommendation."   With respect to WLS, the Board declined to
> accept the recommendation of the DNSO yet failed to return the recommendation
> to the DNSO for further consideration -- Why?
>
> I do not seek to challenge the Board's decision with regard to WLS, only the
> Board's conduct with respect to the Bylaws.  Can you offer a rational
> justification for the Board's violation of these bylaws?
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 127k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 972-244-3801
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>