Re: [atlarge-discuss] RE: [ga] ICANN reimburse $75,000 to GAC for GAC secretariat

["J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey@club-internet.fr>]

At 08:55 20/08/02, richard.hill@itu.int wrote:
><snip>
> >   Ok thanks Richard for the Heads up and clarification here...  >:)
> > My only question is what is in the ITU's view a "in-kind contribution,
> > support for a portion of the secretariat services" if not in
> > effect being
> > willing to pay for those services or provide them at the cost
> > of/to the
> > ITU?
>
>This is correct, but there would in fact have no marginal cost to ITU, since
>ITU staff attend the GAC meetings anyway and take notes anyway.  Also, the
>ITU handles such a large volume of documents that adding the few documents
>for GAC would have no measurable impact on costs.

But why to get if for free in the way GAC Members have voted it a long ago 
and pay for it, when ICANN can pay? All the myth of ICANN would be gone (I 
spell myth with a "J", an "o", etc...)

jfc