Re: [ga] Nomination Procedure for nominating ICANN Board Director candidates

["Roberto Gaetano" <ploki_xyz@hotmail.com>]

FYI, the PSO is also in the process of electing a Director, following the 
resignation of Phil Davidson. Deadline for nomination has been extended to 
2002-08-15.
RG


>From: Elisabeth Porteneuve <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>
>To: fausett@lextext.com, ga@dnso.org
>Subject: Re: [ga] Nomination Procedure for nominating ICANN Board Director 
>candidates
>Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 21:09:49 +0200 (MET DST)
>
>Bret,
>
>Today Bylaws set up obligations on each SOs, one of them is to proceed
>on time and to elect ICANN Board directors.
>
>Until we receive the clear implementation schedule and timeline
>for ICANN 2 (whatever it is, as amended in Bucharest, work in progress,
>letters to DoC in progress, see your own blog), we have to follow rules.
>Otherwise it is anarchy.
>
>Elisabeth Porteneuve
>
>--
> > From owner-ga@dnso.org Fri Aug  9 18:56 MET 2002
> > User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.0.2006
> > Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2002 09:55:55 -0700
> > Subject: Re: [ga] Nomination Procedure for nominating ICANN Board 
>Director
> > 	candidates
> > From: Bret Fausett <fausett@lextext.com>
> > To: DNSO Secretariat <DNSO.secretariat@dnso.org>, <ga@dnso.org>
> > Message-ID: <B979422B.ED22%fausett@lextext.com>
> > Mime-version: 1.0
> > Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
> >
> > Can someone clarify what we're doing here? I'm a bit confused. By the 
>time
> > the new Director elected pursuant to the just announced process would be
> > seated, the Reform process will have been completed. I'm assuming that 
>the
> > Blueprint, or something very close to it, will be in place at that 
>point,
> > which would give the GNSO only two Board seats.
> >
> > In the likely event the Blueprint passes, the GNSO then will need to 
>hold
> > *new* elections for its two Board seats. Existing DNSO Board 
>representatives
> > might be reelected, but I wouldn't favor allowing them to retain their 
>seats
> > without standing for election, as that wouldn't account for the GNSO's 
>new
> > status (which will have a new make-up to the constituencies) or its new
> > priorities.
> >
> > Is there a way to compress this process so we don't waste time and 
>effort by
> > holding redundant elections?
> >
> >         -- Bret
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> >
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html