[ga] Auerbach "Wishlist"
Title: Help 13. I would like to know the precise nature and content of exchanges that
took place between ICANN Board members, and with Afilias Board and/or executives
and/or staff regarding: the development of the Sunrise process; the action to be
taken in response to complaints last summer and autumn that the Sunrise process
was being abused; the calls for intervention to protect Landrush customers; the
calls for investigation of accredited registrars like Yesnic who submitted
ineligible Trademark Data for up to or over 200 Sunrise registrations; the
complaints about the Afilias CEO and his Registrar company in the Sunrise
process; other matters pertaining to the Afilias .info debacle
14. I would like to know the precise nature and content of exchanges that
took place between ICANN Board members, and with Afilias Board and/or executives
and/or staff, and with Neulevel regarding: the abuse of process in .biz2B; the
alleged "warehousing" of names by certain registrars in .biz2B; the use of
"exclusive" lists in .biz2B which excluded the public; the restriction of lists
to single applicants in .biz2B; and also the warnings and questions raised with
Dan Halloran and also posted to Vint Cerf and Stuart Lynn, concerning the
likelihood of a repeat of these problems in .info LR2 (which warning was
apparently ignored but was fulfilled when the same things did, indeed, happen in
.info LR2) - it is now 80 days since Dan Halloran was asked 14 serious questions
on these matters and he STILL hasn't had the courtesy to reply either to the
original or to repeated copies of the same; did the Board advise or instruct him
not to respond? Did the Board take ANY recorded action to address the problems
or were the concerns entirely overlooked?
Richard Henderson
----- Original Message -----
From: J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin <jefsey@club-internet.fr>
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 10:01 AM
Subject: RE: [atlarge-discuss] Auerbach v ICANN - Karl Won > >1. On Conflict of Interest Issues: Which Directors and /or their immediate > >families were shareholders in VeriSign stock immediately prior to the > >approval of the VeriSign Contract regarding.com? > >2. How much has ICANN spent on defending the Auerbach lawsuit so far? > >3. Who is the .org consultant? > >4. Has Jones Day provided a breakdown of their charges for legal services to > >ICANN or on what basis do they charge exactly? > > 5. On Dec 2000 which stocks were owned by Directors (who did not step down) > and their family in each of the 7 accepted TLDs related companies. > 6. I am interested in every note and record between board members and Staff > and Staff and JDRP > 7. I am interested in every exchange between Staff and VeriSign, > particularly regarding Plan B > 8. I am interested in every exchange between Staff, BoD and JDRP regarding > the revision of the ICANN status and the visits of Joe Sims in Brussels and > relations with EU > 8. I am interested in every exchange regarding the pre-agreement between > GAC and Staff/BoD regarding the country names.info prior to he delegation > of .info > 9. I am interested in every exchange regarding the ".eu" delegation > 10. I am interested in every exchanged between Staff, BoD Members, persons > of the public, JDRP, ALSC, ERC regarding the @large > 11. Esther reporting the Denise compromises between Staff and BoD, I am > interested in any mail reflecting the positions of BoD and Staff sent to > Dneise (and incidently where she sent the form I am to receive as france@large) > 12. I am interested in understanding what the ICANN reports to taxes ad > charity, educational and resarch and under which legal frabchise it acts to > support illegal activites such as the support of services to terrorist > countries according to the US Law. > etc... > > > > > >6. > > > >I'm sure you can do better than this, please feel free to add questions. > > > >Regards, > >Joanna |