ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Names Policy Development Process



On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Sandy Harris wrote:

> > Its not, and using a RFC from the IETF
> > is hardly a way of legitamixing something.
>
> For any technical issue about Internet protocols, they (and the rest of
> the
> structure, IESG, IAB, etc) aren't just the only legitimate authority.
> They
> are the only authority, period.

bullshit and jibberish.  they are not an authority.  they are recognized
as a standards body.  thats it.  and like any standards body if they screw
up they can loose their status and respect in the community.

i think alot of you people need some lessons in economics and law.  you
sputter claims without any understanding of what exactly it is you are
muttering or making claim to.  and much of the historical understanding of
these issues i have seen here is juvenile and misinformed.


Cheers
Joe Baptista

--
Planet Communications & Computing Facility
a division of The dot.GOD Registry, Limited


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>