Re: [ga] FYI: Working Paper on At Large Advisory Committee

[Eric Dierker <eric@it.com.vn>]

Alex,

kindly please explain why this is not simply a filter mechanism for ICANN, 
providing both plausible deniability and a whipping group should things go 
wrong.

Why not just have the groups directly inerface with ICANN?
I am sure there is a reason for this three tier buracracy but I just would 
like to know what it is.
sincerely,
Eric
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> a Working Paper on the At Large Advisory Committee (remember?
> its creation was "considered" in Bucharest) has been published.
> This is not an ICANN/E+RC document; I've written it.
> 
> Please have a look at http://www.alac.info -- read the documents,
> look at the slides, send comments (and endorsements). According
> to the proposal, an ALAC should be used as an interface between
> user organizations and ICANN.
> 
> The Evolution and Reform Committee had called for initial 
>suggestions from the At Large Organizing Committee by July 26 and 
>detailed recommendations by August 16.
> 
> Best regards,
> /// Alexander
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html