Re: [ga] your comments

["Bret A. Fausett" <fausett@lextext.com>]

This is nonsense. You know that, right? Yes, ICANN was never fully formed,
but that's not because of Ted's efforts. To the contrary, the ICANN that was
approved by the Department of Commerce called for the election of 9 At Large
Board members. Laying blame is certainly not a productive use of our time,
but if we're going to go down that road, I'm more inclined to lay the fault
for not getting ICANN 'fully formed' at your doorstep.

     -- Bret

Joe Sims wrote:
> If ICANN was fully formed and funded, and then performed badly, you would
> have a good case for doing something different.  But since it has not had
> either feature, in large part because of efforts by you and your
> compatriots  to try to force down the rest of the world's throats your view
> of ICANN as world government, then there is hardly a case for ICANN having
> failed since it has never really ever been fully formed and operational.

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html