ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Bret Fausett's contributions


Joe Sims wrote:
> ...it would be odd for the cc's to have the right to elect members to the
> Board of an organization whose policy decisions they refused to recognize as
> having any effect on them.

Maybe that's a carrot. You can imagine a CCSO in which only those ccTLDs
with a contractual relationship to ICANN had a vote for Director, or even
dividing the voting into thirds: one seat elected by those ccTLDs in a
triangular relationship, one seat elected by those in a legacy relationship,
and one seat elected by those who fund ICANN but have not yet signed a
contract. 

I was going to draft something along those lines, but thought the ccSO
solution should be proposed, at least in the first instance, by the ccSOs
themselves. 

     -- Bret

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>