[ga] Is there a third consensus ?
I asked yesterday if everyone agreed (consensus) that the resolution of the
situation created by:
- our consensus that Lynn's evaluation of the inability of the ICANN to
currentrly fullfil its mission is correct
- our consensus that Lynn's propositions are inadequate
can only result from a consensus of the Internet Community and needs it to
None has objected yet. Please speak-up now if you object. You will kill the
ICANN but you will save our time.
I will repeat that request until tomorrow. If none seriously object I will
consider there is a consensus on that need.
I will then ask if there is a consensus on a working method to reach such a
consensus. I will also dedicate a site and some time to the organization of
that method which has to be very very light and simple and respect but
present the work carried by committees.
Otherwise I will dedicate that time to the building of a community
alternative solution to the ICANN. IMHO we still are in a position to save
the ICANN, but there are enough forces on the move for the window to close
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html