Re: [ga] ICANN & US policy

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

I await other governments proposals how to run this better.

Perhaps a smaller country with less bureaucracy should handle the matter.

Eric

DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:

> Stuart,
>
> There are many portions of your reform proposal that seem to me to be at odds
> with U.S. policy as enumerated in the White Paper.  To cite just one example,
> the White Paper states: "the new Corporation should restrict official
> government representation on the Board of Directors without precluding
> governments and intergovernmental organizations from participating as
> Internet users or in a non-voting advisory capacity."
>
> Are you suggesting that ICANN should reorganize in a manner that defies
> current US policy?
>
> -- danny --
>
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html