Re: [ga] Fw: Discussion Paper: Redemption Grace PeriodsforDeleted Names

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

Harold Whiting wrote:

Well said - comments below.

<snip>

> You may not dictate what is acceptable to the world by what is only
> acceptable to you.
>
> The market is slaughtering those that registered every name under the sun
> thinking that they would all sell for millions, this is where a large
> percentage of the deletions actually come from!
>
> But all of this is a sidetrack from the primary issue at hand.  A proposal
> has been made, by ICANN even!  I strongly suggest that the focus be on that
> rather than the utopian ideals that this particular dialog is skirting.
>
> --HJW--

Lets go back to WXWs' point.

All commercial resellers and/or accredited ICANN registrars and registries must use
it or give it back.

Give it back means to the public or to the deleted owner. Give it back means at
non-speculative prices.

There you go, that ain't no pie in the sky, that there is brass tacks.

The bottom line is warehousing and registrar/registry reselling = real bad
practice.

5 - 45 does not bother me at all.  - irrelevant.

Consensus on stopping these cancerous processes of name hoarding by the folks that
control the spaces,
that is the key.

We await in the next twenty four hours a response from Mr. Gomes on the very issue
which is core here.

Thanks to all for their vigilance.

As is obvious our Chair could not possibly care less.

Sincerely,
Eric

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html