ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Consumer/Registrant Protection Consitituency


Some day I hope to see a constituency for just plain old every day non domain name
holding users.
But until then; "me too".

I believe you should count Joanna.


""me too" on both of these posts.
Regards,
Joanna "

Sincerely,
Eric

Sotiris Sotiropoulos wrote:

> DPF wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 31 Jul 2001 09:43:44 -0400, Sotiris Sotiropoulos
> > <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com> wrote:
> >
> > >erica wrote:
> > >
> > >> Can we move on to discuss the broad objectives of the proposed constituency
> > >> and funding issues?
> > >
> > >A rough blanket statement of the broad objectives of the Individual Registrants
> > >Constituency (IRC) might be as follows:
> > >
> > >"Mission:  To effect and ensure the recognition, representation, and input of
> > >Individual Registrants of Domain Names as bona fide stakeholders in the Domain
> > >Name System (DNS), through an established and direct voice in all ICANN policy
> > >formulation bodies and functions."
> >
> > I know I shouldn't do too many "me too"posts but what Sotiris said
> > works for me.
>
> Thanks David.
>
> So far, myself, David and Joop...  anyone else?
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>