[ga] Re: [ALSC-Forum] Options A,B,C
Karl and all stakeholders or interested parties,
Karl Auerbach wrote:
> I certainly hope that people do not treat these so-called "options" as
> hard channels into which thinking must flow.
My feelings as well, as I indicated in my earlier post on this thread.
> I find these "options" to be more akin to mental straitjackets than useful
> tools of analysis.
Agreed. However they are rather clever or deceiving as such.
> I am particularly sad to see that all the "options"
> seem to accept without question the continued existance of "Supporting
Yes. "Supporting Organizations" as defined by the ICANN BoD and not
the stakeholders are therefore so limited. Another limiting of thinking...
> To the extent that ICANN has elements that carve out privileged roles for
> various industry groups - registrars, registries, ISPs, trademark holders,
> etc - then to that extent democratic values are diminished, perhaps to the
> point of vanishing.
Agreed, but sadly and disgustingly so...
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
Contact Number: 972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html