Re: [ga] Letter from ICANN to New.net
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 06:48:42PM -0700, William S. Lovell wrote:
> A telling presumption exhibited here: if the "protocol community"
> doesn't like something, ICANN should dump it.
Yes. That is the same presumption you would use to say "if heart
surgeons think a procdure is dangerous, dump it".
> However, the
> Internet does not exist for the benefit of the "protocol community"
> or ICANN; those two entities exist for the benefit of Internet
Right. Medicine doesn't exist for the benefit of doctors. But if
doctors tell us something is a bad idea, we generally listen. If we
got practically universal agreement among doctors that a procedure was a
bad idea, we should almost certainly dump it.
The problem is protocol engineering really is a species of "rocket
science"* -- it takes a long time to really understand the issues. And,
despitewhat you hear, most of the participants on these lists really
aren't rocket scientists of the proper variety.
(*) for those who may not be familiar with the idiom, "rocket science"
is a slang phrase meaning "truly esoteric and specialized technical
Kent Crispin "Be good, and you will be
firstname.lastname@example.org lonesome." -- Mark Twain
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html