ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Moving Discussion -- Call on the Chair


No. It is not!  The motion and it's progeny and heredity are foul and ill conceived.
Some would have us run roughshod over existing rules and parliamentary procedures.
They should be stopped and order brought to bare.
Sincerely,

"Michael F. McNulty" wrote:

> Is it in order to "call for the question"?
> Michael McNulty
>
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos wrote:
>
> > Patrick Corliss wrote:
> > <snip>
> >
> > > Enough prevarication, Sotiris, do you support the motion YES or NO ?
> >
> > Patrick, I take issue with being called pretty much a liar for no good reason at
> > all.  I am not equivocating on this "motion", I am trying to get a better
> > understanding of its circumstances, scope, and intent.  If it is also against
> > the rules to ask questions, then what exactly *is* allowed by the "rules"?
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > Sotiris Sotiropoulos
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>