Re: [ga] MOTION - "In Favour" or "Opposed" ???

[Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales <vany@sdnp.org.pa>]

Bill:

On Wed, 9 May 2001, William S. Lovell wrote:

>
>
> Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales wrote:
>
> > Chuck:
> >
> > On Wed, 9 May 2001, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> >
> > > Vany,
> > >
> > > I understand that.  That was because the initial constituencies were
> > > preselected and listed in the Bylaws.  That is not the case for any new
> > > constituencies that may be added.
> > Then the ICANN Board might clear and publish which are the steps and
> > procedures to add a new constituency in the DNSO.
>
> With all respect, ICANN has no obligation to do anything of the kind.


> According to http://www.glocom.ac.jp/users/ajp/ncmem.html, the
> NCDNHC has 63 members.
false.  We have more members.  But you just went to the end of the webpage
without read the whole.  We have 63 Large members and 102 Small members.

> That, plus being proposed in the initial
> ICANN Bylaws, sufficed to get the NCDNHC set up as a functioning
> entity.
Do you  mean that ICANN Board will not consider never even the idea to add
a new constituency, just because it is not included in the By-Laws?

> Not alone, of course -- certain ones of those 63 put together
> a charter, and applied.
But because ICANN indicated us the procedures to follow.

> Since there is no Individual Domain Name
> Holder Constituency even mentioned in those Bylaws, those who wish
> there to be one have a much rougher row to hoe.  A group that has
> to be spoon fed is not likely to be very welcome in the ICANN halls.
Then...which way they have to follow?  Does ICANN Board will give the
opportunity to the supporters of a new constituency the chance to apply?
If yes, how can they apply?

> Besides what I've mentioned earlier, this ga bunch might then wish to
> create an IDNHC Charter Working Group (since that seems to be
> the term commonly in use, I use it now instead of "committee"). The
> product should then be an attachment to a request that an IDNHC
> be authorized. One cannot pretend to seek "bottom up" operation
> while at the same time looking for direction from the top down.
Will ICANN accept this way to proceed? First a new constituency have to
resolved to be created before a charter be drafted for futher aprooval, as
historically happened with the actual seven constituencies.  And such
charter has to be made by the group or groups that wish to organize such
constituency, then charters are submited to ICANN, then ICANN aprooves the
charter of the group they find more suitable.  I didn't invented this
procedure, this was setted-up by ICANN for the seven constituencies.   The
clue is: which procedures has to follow to add a new consitutency?

Best Regards
Vany


-- 
Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales
IT Specialist
Sustainable Development Networking Programme/Panama
Tel: (507) 230-4011 ext 213
Fax: (507) 230-3455
e-mail: vany@sdnp.org.pa
http://www.sdnp.org.pa

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html