Re: [ga] Rules for new lists -- needed or not?

[Eric Dierker <eric@HI-TEK.COM>]

Let us let the lists run themselves it is far more bottoms-up, and the method
currently used by list monitors will be changed somewhat anyhow. We do not need
centralized control. We need focus and transparency and freedom of thought. Even
if some do not like it, myself included sometimes;>)
Specific direction on a list seems to reslove list problems as it did in the
WG-Review.

"Gomes, Chuck" wrote:

> As I recall, there were no rules established for Working Group E, nor were
> there really any problems with decorum.  That could probably be explained by
> the fact that WG E did not involve a controversial topic, but rather one
> that not a lot of people were interested in (Global Awareness and Outreach).
> The experience of WG E is therefore not very useful in this discussion.
>
> Chuck
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: babybows.com [mailto:webmaster@babybows.com]
> Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2001 9:12 PM
> To: ga@dnso.org
> Subject: [ga] Rules for new lists -- needed or not?
>
> Questions for those of you that participated in working groups A,B,C,D,E,
> and Review...
>
> Did your working groups have formal rules?  If not, were there many
> instances of decorum problems?   Did you manage to get the work done without
> recourse to an abuse resolution process?  We need to determine what rules,
> if any, should govern these lists.  Perhaps past experience can guide us.
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html