ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Re: Additional Mailing Lists


On Sun, 22 Apr 2001, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:

> One note - I think it natural that the rules for monitoring of the new
> mailing lists should be the same as for the GA list (decorum, chair can ask
> for posting limit, list monitor team and suspensions).
> I also think it natural that the lists have the same monitors as the main
> list (although not all monitors will be on all lists, one could ask for at
> least 2 of them to be on each), but that suspensions are per list, not for
> all the GA lists.
>
> But I'm biased. Other thoughts?

While I agree with *objective* "civil discourse" rules, I find that
stifiling participation via posting limits is counterproductive to the
very purpose of discussion lists.

/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
                               Patrick Greenwell
                       Earth is a single point of failure.
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>