Re: [ga] [Clarification] NC Proxies
DNSO Secretariat and all remaining assembly members,
I don't recall a vote by the GA on this rule. Is there a record of
GA members voting in favor of this rule?
This rule seems pretty restrictive and non-standard form a marketplace
point of view....
DNSO Secretariat wrote:
> | > from a practical point of view it shows that we should not elect NC-
> | >members which are not able to handle proxies :-)
> | Proxies means that people who were not selected by their constituencies get
> | to represet their constituencies.
> The Rules of Procedure for the DNSO Names Council, adopted 26 Feb 2001,
> cf. http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20010220.NCprocedures-v2.0.html
> 4. Proxies
> 4.1 Eligibility
> Only elected Names Council members may cast a proxy vote on
> behalf of another Names Council member.
> It is compliant with ICANN Bylaws:
> DNSO Secretariat
> This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
> Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
Contact Number: 972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html