Re: [ga] Removal of Directors

["Siegfried Langenbach" <svl@nrw.net>]

On 8 Apr 01, at 11:57, 'Kent Crispin' wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 12:07:27PM -0700, William X. Walsh wrote:
> > Further, Kent's comments are irrelevant.  The only reason it was not a
> > a majority of all the elected positions was because the conference did
> > not have all of the elected members there.
> 
> Doesn't matter what the reason.  The bylaws say a vote of all members, 
> not a vote of members present.  Fact.
> 

 welllllll,
 from a legal point of view you are right
 from a "spirit" point of view 9 against 5 in favor is something I 
personally would not oversee.
 from a practical point of view it shows that we should not elect NC-
members which are not able to handle proxies :-)

siegfried
> -- 
> Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
> kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
> 



--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html