Re: [ga] Removal of Directors
On 8 Apr 01, at 11:57, 'Kent Crispin' wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 12:07:27PM -0700, William X. Walsh wrote:
> > Further, Kent's comments are irrelevant. The only reason it was not a
> > a majority of all the elected positions was because the conference did
> > not have all of the elected members there.
> Doesn't matter what the reason. The bylaws say a vote of all members,
> not a vote of members present. Fact.
from a legal point of view you are right
from a "spirit" point of view 9 against 5 in favor is something I
personally would not oversee.
from a practical point of view it shows that we should not elect NC-
members which are not able to handle proxies :-)
> Kent Crispin "Be good, and you will be
> firstname.lastname@example.org lonesome." -- Mark Twain
> This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
> Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html