RE: Re: [ga] serious participation in ICANN processes
At 02:21 AM 4/9/2001, Dassa wrote:
>This is one area that the UDRP really disappoints me. It should be a
>to a handle ALL domain disputes and not just trademark issues.
It is important to crawl before walking. The UDRP is rather experimental,
given its global implication. Hence it is important to start with the
narrowest mechanism possible, to limit the damage if there are serious
problems. (Please see your previous postings for examples of such concerns.)
There were attempts to expand the scope of the UDRP but they were -- very
wisely -- resisted.
Dave Crocker <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
tel: +1.408.246.8253; fax: +1.408.273.6464
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html