RE: [ga] percentages and numbers of cases
At 11:09 08.04.2001 -0700, Roeland Meyer wrote:
> > Having heard one or another report that someone, somewhere
> > has some sort of
> > problem does not warrant making a change to ensure that that
> > particular
> > thing never happens again.
>However, it is a serious complaint that a performance tracking system does
>not exist for UDRP. It is simple to construct one and WIPO ain't broke.
I believe (based on a conversation with a WIPO person) that WIPO in fact
does performance tracking for the UDRP as executed by WIPO.
a) does nothing for ensuring consistency between UDRP providers
b) is unlikely to be made public, because it reflects directly on
personnel issues, which are usually privacy-restricted.
I doubt the "simple" part of the statement above, though. What to track can
be really fun to try to describe. But agree that no measurements = very
little knowledge; it's a worthwhile exercise.
(BTW, wrt the "someone, somewhere" above: reports of problems that have
domain names and WIPO/NADF/xxx docket numbers are quite a bit easier to
discuss than "someone once reported that they had a problem".....)
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html