DNSO Mailling lists archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] percentages and numbers of cases

At 00:38 08.04.2001 +0200, Marc Schneiders wrote:
>And there are reports of cases, where the respondent received the
>complaint so late, that he could not respond in time, despite correct
>whois details, so without any fault on his part. People are also away
>for some days or a week. Bad luck then under the UDRP.

Yes. The timeout is too short, and the procedures for "oops, I should have 
replied" are nonexistent.

I think a revised UDRP should have a longer timeout for initial response, 
and a procedure for re-evaluation of the case within (say) 3 months in the 
case of new evidence (such as the owner coming back from holidays) coming 
to light.

This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>