RE: [ga] Letter to board.

["Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>]

some of the changes were in what was asked for by the constituencies. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Kent Crispin [mailto:kent@songbird.com]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 11:02 AM
To: ga dnso
Subject: Re: [ga] Letter to board.


On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 06:14:57AM -0400, Joanna Lane wrote:
> WXW wrote:-
> We must be careful to avoid such obvious pitfalls in our individual
> dealings,or do harm to the real legitimacy of the GA and its processes
> that we are trying to build.
> 
> William,
> What is doing more harm to the real legitimacy of the GA and the processes
> we are trying to build is last minute revisions to irrevocable ICANN
> contracts that we were told could not be revised.

Correction: In fact we were told that VRSN refused to countenance an
extension, or changes.  As far as I know, VRSN still refuses to
contenance an extension; but they agreed at the last minute some changes
which it hoped would sweeten the deal (which is it's right as an
independent actor in all this).  ICANN jumped at the opportunity to
wring a few more concessions. 

> This warrants a clear
> message of objection to be sent to the decision makers in a timely
fashion.

No, it doesn't.

-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html