Re: [ga] Draft Resolution
I see that you have rewritten the history to your convenience. This is
acceptable since you promote the idea that the iCANN/VeriSign are
together acting for the best of the Internet Community.
On 18:44 17/03/01, Kent Crispin said:
> > - Verisign would be in a position where it could purchase other
> > Registrars thus once again gaining over 50% or even 75% of the
> > registrar market in *.com, as well as the registry.
>Big "So what". Any large company can do this; it is independent of the
>issue of the registrar/registry split.
But this one I do not undrstand: if a registry cannot be a registrar
I hardly see how any "big" or "small" company could be both (through
affliates) registry and registrar.
BTW I thank you for your demonstration: my main point is to
show that iCANN and VeriSign are trying to become our nice
Big Brother making us happy against our poor inability to rule
our own business. This is exactly what you descibe in your
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html