| <<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
 Re: [ga] GA Straw Poll
 
>From: Bruce James 
>Reply-To: Bruce James 
>To: "[GA]" , Geurs Dave-xdat11 
>Subject: [ga] GA Straw Poll 
>Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:10:49 -0600 
> 
>I will always defer to the Chair. 
> 
>I now call for the Chair to conduct a "Straw Poll", and save us all a lot of 
>time. 
> 
>I am sorry you do not like a "Straw Poll". I have found it VERY useful in 
>finding how everyone feels on a given "vote" to come, AND does save a great 
>deal of time for all involved. 
> 
>I sit on 5 Boards and we do this quite often. 
> 
>/Bruce 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Geurs Dave-xdat11" 
>To: "'Bruce James'" ; "'[GA]'" 
>Cc: "Geurs Dave-xdat11" 
>Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 9:39 AM 
>Subject: RE: [ga] GA Straw Poll 
> 
> 
>Bruce, 
> 
>I do not believe in "straw polls" called by people other than the chair. If 
>you want to have a straw poll, put it up to the chair. Otherwise it is a 
>wasted execise. The chair is there to do these things. Use the structure. 
> 
>Dave 
> 
> 
>-----Original Message----- 
>From: Bruce James [mailto:bmjames@swbell.net] 
>Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 8:32 AM 
>To: [GA] 
>Subject: [ga] GA Straw Poll 
> 
> 
>Thank you all for your input to our "Straw Poll". 
> 
>I would like remind everyone that a "Straw Poll" is just that..... 
> 
> A non-binding feel of the GA and its view of the new contract. 
> 
> So far all of the "votes" have been "for" keeping the current contract 
>in place. 
> 
>I welcome more "votes" either way: 
> 
> 1.) Keep the current VeriSign contract. 
> 
> 2.) Agree to the new VeriSign contract. 
> 
> 
>/Bruce 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Dassa" 
>To: 
>Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 6:39 AM 
>Subject: RE: [ga] straw poll 
> 
> 
>I have already stated my position on the contract and given one of the 
>reasons 
>for my thinking. I will most likely contribute other reasons as the 
>discussion 
>progresses. In the Meantime: 
> 
>I vote for retaining the existing contract. 
> 
>Darryl (Dassa) Lynch. 
> 
>-- 
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list. 
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe 
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message). 
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html 
> 
> 
> 
>-- 
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list. 
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe 
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message). 
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>-- 
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list. 
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe 
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message). 
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html 
>GA members, Please continue expressing your preference on the question raised by Bruce: this straw poll has the endorsement of the Chair, as requested by Dave (see below). As I started already counting, those who have already answered need not repeat the "show of hand". Of course, it will be good if others are counting as well, just in case I miss somebody. Regards Roberto P.S.: I still think that this exercise has to be complemented by a document that explains the reasons for the choice - I am also keeping track of the argumentations so far, and will try to summarize sometimes next week.
 
 Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
 --
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
 
 <<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
 |