Re: [ga] Re: Board decisions
Patrick I come back on this. When I read it it upsets me.
On 12:31 15/03/01, Patrick Corliss said:
> > In Melbourne, Joe Sims advised that Verisign was working on the divestiture
> > according to Plan A when they (Verisign) presented another option to ICANN
> > stafff for consideration. ICANN staff rejected that particular
> proposal but
> > this opened the door to discussions.
You/we found that sentence a good explanation. But when you conisder it it
is a shame. Joe Sims (an external consultant) advised you (an @large
Member, a stakeholder and a ccTLD Director, Member of the DNSO, Member of
the WG-Review) that VeriSign presented ICANN (ie BoD, DNSO) a new plan that
you/we should have considered (but you/we don't even know what was proposed
yet). Then he tells you/us that he refused it on your/our behalf and
started new discussions, of which we learn the real nature through a
semi-public letter from the other party.
Would this happen in my company, I would fire the guy. Would you not in yours?
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html