| <<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
 RE: [ga] Re: Board decisions
To: "'jo-uk@rcn.com'" <jo-uk@rcn.com>, Bruce James <bmjames@swbell.net>,       "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com>,       "'Andy Gardner'" <andy@navigator.co.nz>, vint cerf <vcerf@MCI.NET>,       Roberto Gaetano <ga_chair@hotmail.com>, dhc2@dcrocker.net,       patrick@stealthgeeks.netSubject: RE: [ga] Re: Board decisionsFrom: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com>Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 03:35:49 -0500Cc: weinberg@mail.msen.com, svl@nrw.net, apisan@servidor.unam.mx,       Amadeu@nominalia.com, karl@CaveBear.com, jcohen@shapirocohen.com,       phil.davidson@bt.com, f.fitzsimmons@att.net, ken.fockler@sympatico.ca,       mkatoh@wdc.fujitsu.com, hans@icann.org, shkyong@kgsm.kaist.ac.kr,       andy@ccc.de, junsec@wide.ad.jp, quaynor@ghana.com, roberts@icann.org,       helmut.schink@icn.siemens.de, linda@icann.org, ga@dnso.org,       ecdiscuss@ec-pop.org, core@corenic.orgSender: owner-ga-full@dnso.org 
 
VeriSign proposed the idea of committing to an investment of $200m over 10
years if the agreement was successfully renegotiated.  ICANN then proposed
new terms and negotiations started.  Recognizing that I was not directly
involved in the negotiations, it appears to me that the terms proposed by
ICANN were basically the terms in the new gTLD agreements.  I conclude this
because the new .net and .org agreements are almost identical to the new
gTLD agreements.
So the short answer is: ICANN proposed the terms of the new agreement after
VeriSign suggested the possibility of the investment.  Joe Sims confirmed
this in Melbourne.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: Joanna Lane [mailto:jo-uk@rcn.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 1:04 AM
To: Bruce James; Gomes, Chuck; 'Andy Gardner'; vint cerf; Roberto
Gaetano; dhc2@dcrocker.net; patrick@stealthgeeks.net
Cc: weinberg@mail.msen.com; svl@nrw.net; apisan@servidor.unam.mx;
Amadeu@nominalia.com; karl@CaveBear.com; jcohen@shapirocohen.com;
phil.davidson@bt.com; f.fitzsimmons@att.net; ken.fockler@sympatico.ca;
mkatoh@wdc.fujitsu.com; hans@icann.org; shkyong@kgsm.kaist.ac.kr;
andy@ccc.de; junsec@wide.ad.jp; quaynor@ghana.com; roberts@icann.org;
helmut.schink@icn.siemens.de; linda@icann.org; ga@dnso.org;
ecdiscuss@ec-pop.org; core@corenic.org
Subject: RE: [ga] Re: Board decisions
>>>Keep in mind, we were pursuing a path of complying with the existing
agreement and were very close to finalizing tasks related to that.
Chuck Gomes<<
Hello Chuck,
This new contract did not present itself. Somebody proposed it. Who was that
exactly ?
Joanna
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
 <<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
 |