RE: [ga] Call for focus.....
As Joop's polling booth was used within the WG-Review and there were no major objections I had assumed it was acceptable to the GA.
Can we all have clarification on what the previous proceedure was please and then maybe a call for suggestions on how to develop the election proceedure.
Darryl (Dassa) Lynch.
|>[mailto:email@example.com]On Behalf Of
|>Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 9:38 PM
|>To: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com
|>Subject: RE: [ga] Call for focus.....
|>At 21:01 14/02/2001 +1100, Dassa wrote:
|>>In the interest of getting an interim Chair into place and
|>as this appears to be the best proposal so far, I second this motion.
|>I move this motion be dismissed. (garg)
|>Unfortunately, the use of Joop's voting booth in the context
|>of the GA has led to conflicts in the past. The alternate suggestion made
|>is to use the same format as used for the previous chair nomination for the
|>We need a new rule for the election itself.
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html