RE: Re: [ga] Reform in the GA?
|>From:On Behalf Of Joop Teernstra
|>Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2001 9:50 PM
|>Subject: Re: [ga] Reform in the GA?
|>It describes pretty accurately what is happening on the idno-discuss list
|>I invite those who are interested to learn the lessons and see serious
|>participants resign (www.idno.org/archives) and see for themselves how the
|>posting privileges of a list can be abused by a few people "without
|>consideration for the common good".
|>Don't take my word for it. Check the last few days for yourself.
|>No need to say more about it here. It is sad enough as it is.
I disagree with the assessment but support the notion of all interested parties reading the archives and checking for themselves. Consideration of the common good is such a subjective term, it is often used by politicians to explain why they act in such ways to cause discomfort and concern to the majority.
If you wish to search for specific words I recommend the URL http://www.dhsnames.com/cgi-bin/search.cgi?q=lies&ps=50&o=0&m=all&ul= as a starting point.
Darryl (Dassa) Lynch.
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html