Re: [ga] Call for focus.....
This time I simply ask for a position mail from each nominated. Long enough
before the voting, to debate.
Would they please disclose the obvious: memberships, employment, locale, and in
concrete terms so they can be held accountable, are the pro TM, IDNO, and the
like. For instance Mr. Crispin would obviously disclose his close association
with the IP folks. Mr. De Blanc his association with ccTLDs, Ms. Park, Korea.
Joop Teernstra wrote:
> At 10:49 10/02/01 +1100, Dassa wrote:
> >How about the GA votes for and accepts an interim Chair until such time as
> the outside responsible body designs to address the issue. I think it is
> high time the GA stood up and let itself be counted.
> There is no better way to convince the Board to amend the bylaws than by
> responsibly holding a successful election under our own steam.
> The WG-review proved that it can be done in 15 days, when the nominating
> process is web based.
> In this case the Melbourne Meeting on April 10 should function as the
> logical deadline.
> This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
> Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html