Re: [ga] Reform in the GA?
Friday, February 09, 2001, 10:28:50 PM, Eric Dierker wrote:
> (i)(B) The Board may, with concurrence of a majority of all of its members,
> whether voting or not, remove the Chair of the General Assembly for good
> cause shown. (the argument was we could have a wing nut as chair. How does it
> follow the NC decides when a Chair needs to be removed? When they question the
> NC? (Yikes whether voting or not?????) That is carte Blanche.
Whether voting or not sets a higher standard than most decisions made
by the board. It requires an actual majority of the full complement,
not just a majority of a quorum. It is typical in major decisions
like this to require a higher standard to prevent abuse of it.
Perhaps now that you understand it better, you will see your criticism
of it was just a little off base.
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html