Re: Fw: [ga] Re: [voters] Agenda suggestions for the next NC teleconferences
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 11:07:41PM -0700, Greg Burton wrote:
> That is completely correct. And it is a call for a GA working group, NOT a
> DNSO working group, and not an NC working group.
This is not a helpful distinction.
The term "GA working group" has no defined meaning in the ICANN
world. It has no defined rules of operation, no defined structure, no
defined authority, no defined place to present its results. You might
as well call it a "WG of citizens of the Internet" -- it would be just
as meaningful, just as useful, and just as likely to have an effect.
It would be MUCH better to have it be a formal WG of the DNSO.
Kent Crispin "Be good, and you will be
firstname.lastname@example.org lonesome." -- Mark Twain
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html