Re[2]: [ga] [ADMIN] Suspension of William X. Walsh

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

Hello Harald,

Wednesday, November 15, 2000, 8:41:37 AM, you wrote:

> At 21:22 15/11/2000 +1100, Dassa wrote:
>>Without presuming to contradict the findings of the monitor, I must
>>say that I am surprised by this action for a number of reasons.

> some words from the monitor:

> - the list monitor has been very hesitant to act without a complaint being
>    lodged by someone else, except in the case of postings that were clearly
> ' repetitions of previous acts that caused (unchallenged) monitor reaction.
>    Before this complaint, no official complaint about Walsh' IDNO posting
>    had been lodged. (In fact, the previous complaint to the list monitor
>    was lodged in June. It has been quiet.)

> - the list monitor has been worried about the Walsh/Ternstra spat for some
>    time, but both the lack of an official complaint and the fact that the
>    postings seemed to be about a genuine problem of some relevance to the
>    GA served to delay any action (except an occasional warning).

> - the paragraph quoted in the list monitor action is actually an accusation
> ' of record falsification, rather than anything that can be interpreted in

You are wrong.  It is about the fact that the records cannot be
verified. I did not accuse him of it, I merely pointed out that
falsification was one possibility he had opened himself up for by his
actions.

You've been called on this, even by people who oppose me in list
discussions and regularly find themselves on the opposite sides of
issues with me.

The decision is without merit.

-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html