RE: Re: [ga] RE: [idno] Who said the IDNO welcome diversity?
> From: William X. Walsh: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 11:08 PM
> Tuesday, September 12, 2000, 10:55:05 PM, you wrote:
> >> The issue, the nature of what has been a "proposed" constituency,
> >> properly belonged on the GA list.
> > No, I don't think so. The creation of new consstituencies
> is strictly
> > the pervue of the ICANN BoD. The /ICANN/DNSO/GA has no power there.
> It most certainly is a subject here, Roeland, as Joop's incessant
> posts of late on this list about the IDNO and its "application" are
> evident proof of.
There is a huge difference between talking about the IDNO and carrying
on IDNO internal debate, on the GA list. I'm sorry that you can't see
that. Oh well...
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html