RE: [ga] DNSO ICANN board member
At 15:22 03/09/2000 -0700, Simon Higgs wrote:
>There is no guidance to establish checks and balances in any DNS server
>which has been altered from the vanilla USG-root. I'm halfway through an
>Internet Draft to try and ensure that there is a minimum supported
>baseline (the USG root zone).
I would not see great harm in an "alternate" root where the owners would
automatically vacate within 24 hours any domain that was subsequently added
to the ICANN roots; if changes to the baseline automatically meant that the
alternate roots were changed to conform, most of the potential harm of
alternate roots would be alleviated.
Neither would I see much point in such a construction.
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html