ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] Re: [Nc-tlds] new TLDs, charters -- ICANN control

  • To: General Assembly of the DNSO <ga@dnso.org>
  • Subject: [ga] Re: [Nc-tlds] new TLDs, charters -- ICANN control
  • From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
  • Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 02:37:15 -0700
  • CC: Non-Commercial Domain Name Holders Constituency Discussion List <ncdnhc-discuss@lyris.isoc.org>
  • Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
  • References: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0007060114470.13995-100000@proxy.pccf.net> <17228990381.20000705231048@userfriendly.com>
  • Sender: owner-ga-full@dnso.org

WXW, Jamie, Joe and all,

  I wonder if any of the Domains in .Union of name.space are
trademarked presently or have been used in commerce in any way?
If so than they do have a prior right even though Name.space lost
it's legal claim to it is TLD's presently servicing.

  Is a new set of legal claims in the offing perhaps?

  My guess is that ICANN will not ever approve of any TLD's
that Name space is servicing or any that Superroot is servicing,
or  .WEB by IOD.  But this is just a guess.

  As I have predicted before, ICANN will likely only approve those
registries that CORE wishes and their associated TLD's as well.

William X. Walsh wrote:

> Wednesday, July 05, 2000, 10:22:10 PM, you wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, James Love wrote:
>
> >> Internet, and management of all TLDs.  However, not all registries
> >> should be required to provide first come first serve type services.  For
> >> example, in a .union TLD, if such a TLD is managed by labor unions, they
> >> should be free to manage it, and restrict its use, as they see fit.
>
> > I want to bring to your attention the obvious that your being a
> > hipocrit.  If you believe in the first come first served principle - as I
> > do, then I suggest you should practice what you preach.
>
> > As you know your claim to the tld .union is second to that of name.space -
>
> Name.space's excessive claims to TLDs have surely forfeited any rights
> they might want to claim in any given TLD.  Surely even those who
> believe in this "prior" right issue of registries that knowingly
> operated outside the real operation scope have some standards to
> prevent the excessive squatting of TLDs that name.space would claim
> and engage in.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>  William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 112k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 9236 fwd's to home ph#
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>