[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ga-full] RE: [ga] Proposal: WWW / slashdot
On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
> At 05:44 28.02.00 +0000, Jean-Michel Becar wrote:
> >Harald, Michael,
> >But the way the At Large members is registered via this Web Interface could
> >be an example for the GA membership.
> another idea I had - what if we considered an activated At Large membership
> necessary and sufficient for voting rights in the GA?
This is silly. There ARE 2 kinds of membership:
One for the At Large, and one for the DNSO GA !!!
If we dont have this separation the at-large will be able to vote
NINE members in the Board and CONTROLE the DNSO NC and therefore also
be able have their voice heard this way.
> This would have a couple of advantages:
Absolutely NO advantages for the DNSO.
> - ICANN has to do the verification work anyway, so it's only done once
> - More active use of the ICANN membership code gives more chance that
> weaknesses in the system will be found and corrected
> - It's a drive (a small one) for At Large membership
> Of course, this leaves us without the power to impose or enforce our own
> membership rules, requires people to be willing to sign up for At Large
> membership, and requires that the people running the At Large are willing
> to share at least some information.
> But it's an idea.
DK Hostmaster A/S
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html