Re: [ga-full] Re: [ga] Proposal: List behavior discussions on aseparat list.

[Dnsipv6@aol.com]

Michael and all remaining assembly members,

  A private list is fine as long as it is available for anyone to openly
and freely participate as required by several laws for such a
discussion list associated with ICANN under current contract,
and by California State law for nonprofit organizations.

David "Dude" Jenson

In a message dated 2/18/00 6:35:42 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
froomkin@law.miami.edu writes:

<<  propose using the slashdot engine.  ICANN resists the use of WWW
 interfaces for the understandable reason that they discriminate against
 people whose limited resources require them to use slow links.  A private
 list does not have this constraint.
 
 On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
 
 > At 22:20 17.02.00 +0100, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
 > >Alf,
 > >
 > >I have tried several time to launch the idea of more focused, smaller,
 > >lists, in addition to the main GA list, but there's no enthusiasm so
 > >far.
 > 
 > I am enthusiastic!
 > 
 > >In practical terms, it will be (almost) impossible to do what you
 > >propose "automatically". The only possibility is to create a separate
 > >list, and invite people to discuss the matter over there.
 > >
 > >Do you think it will work? :<(
 > 
 > The only way to see if anyone will come to "that party" is to create the 
 > list and ask people to come.
 > 
 > The other question is whether or not this will help anything on the main 
GA 
 > list.
 > 
 >                  Harald
 >  >>
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html