[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ga-full] Re: [ga] Proposal: List behavior discussions on aseparat list.
I propose using the slashdot engine. ICANN resists the use of WWW
interfaces for the understandable reason that they discriminate against
people whose limited resources require them to use slow links. A private
list does not have this constraint.
On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
> At 22:20 17.02.00 +0100, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> >I have tried several time to launch the idea of more focused, smaller,
> >lists, in addition to the main GA list, but there's no enthusiasm so
> I am enthusiastic!
> >In practical terms, it will be (almost) impossible to do what you
> >propose "automatically". The only possibility is to create a separate
> >list, and invite people to discuss the matter over there.
> >Do you think it will work? :<(
> The only way to see if anyone will come to "that party" is to create the
> list and ask people to come.
> The other question is whether or not this will help anything on the main GA
> Harald Tveit Alvestrand, EDB Maxware, Norway
> This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
> Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
A. Michael Froomkin | Professor of Law | firstname.lastname@example.org
U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
+1 (305) 284-4285 | +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax) | http://www.law.tm
-->It's warm here.<--
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html