[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ga-full] Re: [ga] GA Rules don't go far enough

To: "William X. Walsh" <william@dso.net>
Subject: [ga-full] Re: [ga] GA Rules don't go far enough
From: "!Dr. Joe Baptista" <baptista@pccf.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 19:31:41 -0500 (EST)
cc: ga@dnso.org, list@ifwp.org, DOMAIN-POLICY@LISTS.INTERNIC.NET, ga-abuse@dnso.org
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20000214134759.william@dso.net>
Sender: owner-ga-full@dnso.org

William - congratulation we agree.  This must me an internet first.

On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, William X. Walsh wrote:

> I again renew my call that all members of the GA list must validate by some
> form of identification, such as a govt. issued ID.

I completely agree.  I for one am more then willing to do this, provided
everyone get's the same treatment.  It's about time that we end the
contraversy of who' who.

Regards
Joe Baptista

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

References:
- [ga-full] GA Rules don't go far enough
  - From: "William X. Walsh" <william@dso.net>

Prev by Date: [ga-full] Re: [ga] Remove from list
Next by Date: [ga-full] Re: [ga] Registration process suggestion
Prev by thread: [ga-full] GA Rules don't go far enough
Next by thread: [ga-full] Re: [ga] GA Rules don't go far enough
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread