<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga-abuse] Complaint Against William X. Walsh. Offensive Language.
- To: "Alexander Svensson" <alexander@svensson.de>
- Subject: [ga-abuse] Complaint Against William X. Walsh. Offensive Language.
- From: "Patrick Corliss" <patrick@quad.net.au>
- Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 23:56:21 +1100
- Cc: "[ga-abuse]" <ga-abuse@dnso.org>
- References: <7f.226a4377.29b7a093@cs.com><5.0.2.1.2.20020307094723.032aad40@pop3.paradise.net.nz> <20234406378.20020306164159@userfriendly.com>
- Sender: owner-ga-abuse@dnso.org
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002 16:41:59 -0800, William X Walsh wrote:
Re: Re[2]: [ga] Manipulating the GA's voting rights... a new low
> On Wed, March 06, 2002, 12:48:11 PM, Joop Teernstra wrote:
> > At 18:44 6/03/02 +0100, Jefsey Morfin wrote:
> >>This wording does not prevent the GA to vote in using other solutions than
> >>the DNSO Secretariat. Would the NC and the BoD consider the results of
> >>such votes? The Secretariat owns the voting list (e-mails). Could we
> >>establish a polling committee having access to the list and establishing
> >>an acceptable authentification system?
>
> > Somebody would still have to actually run it and it would still have a
cost.
> > TANSTAAFL.
>
> Bullocks. A properly setup polling system would allow the GA chair to
Hi Alexander
I've mentioned this before. Whenever Joop writes anything, no matter how
inoffensive, William Walsh replies with "Bullocks".
I find this most offensive.
Regards
Patrick Corliss
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|